If it's anything like the UK, it won't make a difference... for example:<br>o2 mobile number ported to orange mobile...<br>On most providers you still pay the o2 rate.<br>three mobile ported to o2...<br>you still pay the three rate (which isn't so good since it's far more expensive than o2).<br>
<br>Cheers<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/3/13 Asterisk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asterisk@abraxas.si">asterisk@abraxas.si</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Dear All,<br>
<br>
I have a small call center in which I have to define least cost routing for outbound calls. For now I have always done this by routing numbers to different providers according to the number prefix.<br>
<br>
However, a new law became effective now which allows people to switch between providers without changing their telephone numbers. This makes least cost routing based on number prefixes much less effective.<br>
<br>
Are there any known solutions for this?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance,<br>
Alex<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>