<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/1/10 Benoit <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:maverick@maverick.eu.org">maverick@maverick.eu.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Olivier a écrit :<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">> Hi,<br>
><br>
> While issuing make, I've got:<br>
> ...<br>
> CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg/kernel/zaptel-base.o<br>
> /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg/kernel/zaptel-base.c: In function<br>
> âzt_registerâ:<br>
> /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg/kernel/zaptel-base.c:5230: error: implicit<br>
> declaration of function âclass_device_createâ<br>
><br>
> My system is Lenny and before getting this error, I successfully did :<br>
><br>
> apt-get source libpri zaptel asterisk<br>
> cd /usr/src/libpri-1.4.3<br>
> make && make install<br>
> cd ../zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg<br>
> ./configure<br>
><br>
> It seems to come from class_device deprecation in linux 2.6.26 (see:<br>
> <a href="http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12944" target="_blank">http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12944</a>), but as Lenny is<br>
> 2.6.26-based this zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg is the latest in Lenny repo, I'm<br>
> wondering what the others are doing to avoid this.<br>
><br>
> Am I missing a step here after downloading zaptel ?<br>
</div></div>Well, Zaptel-1.4.11 is quite old and deprecated, so if you plan to get<br>
support here i would urge you to get the latest DAHDI and Asterisk release<br>
If you wan't to use debian released package, you can<br>
1/ make a bug report at the correct location: <a href="http://bugs.debian.org" target="_blank">bugs.debian.org</a><br>
2/ or use the stable debian release</blockquote><div><br>Yes, I agree with you :<br>as I wanted to quickly get an OSLEC-bristuffed Asterisk running (and was kindly given a patch for that), I used this "apt-get source zaptel" cmd for the first time.<br>
I'm still very surprised to get those compilation errors (as I hoped that the benefit of using Debian rather old versions is be to be kept away from those errors).<br><br>I agree such issue would be more useful in debian mailing list, but before opening a report, I wanted to check here if I missed something obvious.<br>
<br>Thanks for helping<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
As for me i use latest asterisk/dahdi on a stable debian/etch release<br>
and it work like a charm<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>