<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/5/22 Gordon Henderson <<a href="mailto:gordon%2Basterisk@drogon.net">gordon+asterisk@drogon.net</a>>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, 22 May 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:<br>
<br>
> "Steve Totaro" <<a href="mailto:stotaro@totarotechnologies.com">stotaro@totarotechnologies.com</a>> writes:<br>
><br>
>> Then check out Hylafax and IAXmodem. Hylafax has alot of client apps<br>
>> too. As I said before, it is CPU intensive, so you may need separate<br>
>> machines to handle fax. A direct crossover cable for network is the<br>
>> best to eliminate any latency.<br>
><br>
> If you run iaxmodem on the Asterisk server, you can use something like<br>
> termnetd to provide a virtual serial port to Hylafax over the network.<br>
> Then latency, jitter, and packet loss becomes much less of a problem.<br>
<br>
</div>Something that's always confused me - IAXmodem is built on spandsp. RxFAX<br>
is also built on spandsp. RxFAX gets one step closer to the data stream<br>
(no copper/IP in the way), so why are people using (& suggesting) Hylafax<br>
over RxFAX?</blockquote><div>I would say to store incoming faxes ...<br> <br></div><br></div><br>