<div>Isn't this channel specific? Why is this being added? It does not work with SIP. It does not appear to be architecturally generic.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This gets added, but yet a channel specific enhancement for SIP that would be beneficial for endusers does not get added. Again, Asterisk is good at transferring calls around, but when it comes to end users, the developers just keep closing the tickets on the much needed features.<br>
<br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Tilghman Lesher <<a href="mailto:tilghman@mail.jeffandtilghman.com">tilghman@mail.jeffandtilghman.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Monday 24 March 2008 16:08, Al Baker wrote:<br>> at what Rev of Asterisk has, or will, the patch exist in the Standard<br>> Release ?<br><br></div>1.6.0.<br><br>--<br><font color="#888888">Tilghman<br>
</font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c"><br>_______________________________________________<br>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com/" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div>
<br>