<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
About the only reason for eliminating SpanDSP is compatibility with the
GPL license. Remember that <i>any</i> feature added to the free
version of Asterisk is going to be added to ABE as well - ergo, the
licensing of any libraries required need to be compatible with a <i>non</i>-open
source license.<br>
<br>
<br>
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:47C0527E.9020103@sanguinarius.co.uk" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Michelle Dupuis wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Wow, an answer phrased in the form of a flame...
A more supportive tone might actually encourage the Asterisk userbase to
grow!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Okay, if you really want a more constructive answer.
The addition to asterisk was an API change to allow app_fax from
asterisk-addons to talk to asterisk.
app_fax uses spandsp.
Why on earth would you want to eliminiate the need for spandsp?
It would involve re-doing really a lot of work, and spandsp is one of
the finest pieces of coding to be associated with asterisk.
Is that supportive enough?
Bug ID #0011761 looks more interesting.
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.api-digital.com">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>