<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
James FitzGibbon wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midb1c051a50709180650p26e4554fge3acc42d0cbb195b@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On 9/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jim Canfield</b>
<<a href="mailto:jcanfield@tshmail.com">jcanfield@tshmail.com</a>>
wrote:
<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">stuff"
useless. My real concern was the immediate '/ignore' for asking<br>
about an issue with the *now ditro that actually had nothing to do with<br>
the GUI itself. Truth be told, most of my time today was in the CLI
</blockquote>
<div> <br>
You may be taking what happened on IRC a bit too literally.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
You are right, judging from the responses I have received both on and
off-list. Everyone has been extremely polite and understanding. I
partly expected to get flamed on this one. Many thanks to all who
responded!<br>
<blockquote
cite="midb1c051a50709180650p26e4554fge3acc42d0cbb195b@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>
<div><br>
You got plenty of help on your Polycom and call parking issues on
09/14, from some very knowledgeable people. On 09/17, you asked one
question about rPath/Conary and one person did a '/me puts jcanfield on
ignore' emote. He probably didn't even ignore you, it was just his way
of saying he wasn't interested in answering questions about packaging
systems on a Linux distro he doesn't use. The simple answer to your
question ("how do I get the LDAPGet module") is answered on the Wiki -
you download it from the author's site. The question of "how do I
package some arbitrary source code into a conary package?" isn't really
germane to #asterisk.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
In no way did I mean to discredit the help I have received so far. As
a newcomer I saw asterisk/asteriskNOW/Digium as one and the same. I
realize now, the ecosystem that is "Asterisk", is much more diverse
than that. <br>
<blockquote
cite="midb1c051a50709180650p26e4554fge3acc42d0cbb195b@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>
<div><br>
As to the second class citizen point, I think you'll find that people
who come into #asterisk asking about problems with their GUI-enabled
Asterisk install fall into one of two categories: those who are willing
to reduce the problem down to it's non-GUI elements and pastebin the
configs and output, and those who are incapable or unwilling to do so.
The former tend to get help from people on #asterisk; IMHO the latter
should find other places to ask for help, or pay for consulting
services.
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
100% agree.<br>
<br>
Thanks again.<br>
<br>
jc<br>
</body>
</html>