Nice to know, luv to have this practical numbers.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/28/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jean-Michel Hiver</b> <<a href="mailto:jhiver@ykoz.net">jhiver@ykoz.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br><br>I thought I'd give a follow up to this discussion for the archives...<br><br>
Currently I'm trunking 30 channels of g.729 traffic (no transcoding going<br>on, the call comes in and goes out as g.729) and it takes about 350 kbps<br>bandwith bidirectional.<br><br>So on average each call takes 11.5
- 12 kbps of bandwith. The solution<br>seems stable and the QoS is identical... so for the price (2 commodity<br>PCs...), IAX2 trunking is well worth the effort since it reduces bandwith<br>usage by a factor of 2.<br><br>
Cheers,<br>Jean-Michel.<br><br>--<br>Jean-Michel Hiver - YKOZ<br>+262 (0)692 828 070<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com--">
http://www.api-digital.com--</a><br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>