How about required MTU and jitter? I think openvpn will add some latency and frames will be charged with supplementary encapsulation bits.<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 08 May 2007 19:03:09 +0200, <b class="gmail_sendername">Benny Amorsen</b> <<a href="mailto:benny+usenet@amorsen.dk">benny+usenet@amorsen.dk</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">>>>>> "NM" == Noah Miller <<a href="mailto:noahisaacmiller@gmail.com">noahisaacmiller@gmail.com
</a>> writes:<br><br>NM> If it helps at all, I read a study that said that SSL VPN's can<br>NM> actually help with jitter problems. So it might be preferable to<br>NM> implement something with OpenVPN (uses SSL) rather than an
<br>NM> IPSec-based VPN. I found the link:<br><br>Only if you use gold-plated connectors and oxygen-free copper.<br><br><br>/Benny<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
<a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>