<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi again, <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:demuel@thephinix.org">demuel@thephinix.org</a> wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid33142.89.222.8.1.1171547048.squirrel@mail.thephinix.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
I observed that too. I already got that 2.6.x kernel and it is there actually. Though Patrick has
put a 2.6.x kernel in /extra, I am still thinking if I will upgrade my existing kernel in this
laptop. The maintainer of slackware did not made the 2.6.x as the default kernel for some other
reasons he believes. I told you, the slackware 11.0 has a default kernel of 2.4.33.3. I am
sticking with SVN because of development purposes.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<small>Yes you are right there about the default kernel,</small><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid33142.89.222.8.1.1171547048.squirrel@mail.thephinix.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Does this mean that zaptel doesn't have backward compatibility with previous linux kernels? Is it
a bug?<small>
</small></pre>
</blockquote>
<small>I'm starting to think that it could be a backward version
compatibility problem too, I set up a server with Asterisk some days
ago using 1.4 version, but it was with CentOS, and had the 2.6.x kernel
by default. I think i should make some test at home about that issue (I
use it at home),<br>
<br>
Tell me if u find something about that,</small><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid33142.89.222.8.1.1171547048.squirrel@mail.thephinix.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Regards,
Demuel
</pre>
</blockquote>
<small>take care,<br>
<br>
J. Espinal<br>
</small>
</body>
</html>