<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; FONT-FAMILY: tahoma,sans-serif">From: <I>"Ken Williams" <A href="mailto:ken@intermountainelectronics.com">ken@intermountainelectronics.com</A></I><BR>>Asterisk1 <--> NAT1 --- { Internet } --- NAT2 <--> Asterisk2 is one of<BR>>the easiest configs to put together. Works extremely well and requires<BR>>opening a single port on each NAT.<BR></DIV>
<P>Now I realize that I took the wrong assumption that all NAT traversal is blind traversal. By "blind" I picture no port forwarding or any special config - no UPNP, either. At least blind in Linksys grade equipment where few people would add more restrictive rules. This is the area that FWD, MSN, Yahoo shine. (No way to use any of these in my company's network.) When people talk about "just works" category, I think of this scenario.</P>
<P>Any info about Peerio and possibility to have peerio with Asterisk?</P>
<P>Yuan Liu</P></FONT></div></html>