There is no problem with the CPU utilization, it is around 40%, I will not be able to try this without the VPN, maybe I should try another VPN solution like OpenSwan, or PPTP.<br><br>Why do you think that IAX will make a difference than SIP?
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Gordon Henderson</b> <<a href="mailto:gordon+asterisk@drogon.net">gordon+asterisk@drogon.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, O.Kamal wrote:<br><br>> I am trying to connect 2 asterisk servers through OpenVPN, the VPN should<br>> carry 16 channel, however when active channels reached 4 concurrent<br>> channels, the connection became unstable, with a very high latency (around
<br>> 900ms), the internet bandwidth is 1Mbps on each server, I have upgraded the<br>> bandwidth to double it, but still have exactly the same problem.<br>><br>> Any tips or recommendations on such setup?<br><br>
No real answers, but questions that might help ...<br><br>Have you tried it without using OpenVPN? Just port-forward the SIP & RTP<br>ports, if you need to and give it a go.<br><br>> I am using SIP and G729 between the 2 servers, openVPN using UDP with no
<br>> compression.<br><br>Why not IAX?<br><br>Are your openVPN end-points up to it? Doing high-grade encryption in<br>software might challenge some slower processors - are the VPN endpoints<br>the asterisk boxes themselves?
<br><br>Gordon<br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>