Stupid not-quite-an-answer - if you're willing to pay money for a fix, why not buy an IAX2 compatible FXS to replace the SPA-1001 with? It will traverse NATs without a problem. I'm using a GNet VP168I (same as the PA168V) and it works fine even behind a NAT which is itself behind a corporate firewall...
<br><br>Just a thought.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/17/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Eric Lyons</b> <<a href="mailto:eric@gus.to">eric@gus.to</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm still unable to get my SPA-1001 to work behind NAT with an Asterisk box out on the Internet. It works fine to my local A@H box.<br>I've tried... many things.<br><br>I'm willing to pay a $250 bounty (PayPal preferred) to anyone who can help me get it working. Any Sipura experts out there?
<br><br>Eric.<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>Asterisk-Users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>