<br>
I think you are thinking of iLBC:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-iLBC">http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-iLBC</a><br>
<br>
Be aware that this codec is known to be pretty CPU intensive to accomplish its compression.<br>
<br>
- Pedro<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/22/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Sam Tam</b> <<a href="mailto:sam@netenable.co.uk">sam@netenable.co.uk</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I think I have heard in the past that someone mentioned to me there is a<br>codec that does not getting affected much because of packet loss.<br><br>Is there such thing?<br><br>Sam<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br><br>Asterisk-Users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com">Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com</a><br><a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>