<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
Colin Anderson wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid03224271100A29458F0C144F1DB5304D0872@assprelay.landmarkhomes.net"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<title></title>
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1476" name="GENERATOR">
<div><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><span
class="981433218-10022005"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"> > </font></span>Why
would someone choose these over other boxes, such as the Sipura 2000
and 3000?<span class="981433218-10022005"><font color="#0000ff"
face="Arial" size="2"> </font></span></font></div>
<div><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><span
class="981433218-10022005"></span></font> </div>
<div><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><span
class="981433218-10022005"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">Because
I want NAT traversal and a low bandwidth codec. That's the whole point
of IAX2 as opposed to SIP. </font></span><br>
</font></div>
</blockquote>
OK<br>
And the only IAX2 box made is the Digium one, with it's current
shortcomings ?<br>
>From reading through the archives, it seems there is currently no way
to reset to factory default, no written MAC address on an individual
box, and some other instabilities requiring frequent resets. <br>
<br>
Digium support also seems rather slow, to be kind, via E-mail<br>
<br>
John Novack<br>
</body>
</html>