[asterisk-users] Confbridge for 80 devices
Jerry Geis
jerry.geis at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 15:16:44 CDT 2022
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:53 PM Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bringing 80 devices into a conf bridge with CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6
> 1045T Processor at 2.7G and audio is reported as staticy or not the best
> audio quality.
>
> Network is r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: RTL8168e/8111
> Link is 1G.
>
> Asterisk 18.14.0
>
> I would think this should be able to handle 80 calls (one way audio).
>
> How can I tell if asterisk is an able to handle this - or how can I find
> the bottle neck?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jerry
>
So I did the "timing test" got
timing test
Attempting to test a timer with 50 ticks per second.
Using the 'timerfd' timing module for this test.
in modules I added
[modules]
autoload=yes
preload => res_timing_dahdi.so
preload => res_timing_pthread.so
Re-ran the timing test got the same thing.
Notice it says specifically timerfd - not timing_dahdi or timing_pthread.
System is CentOS 7.
lsmod | grep dahdi
lsmod | grep dahdi
dahdi_transcode 14291 1 wctc4xxp
dahdi_voicebus 59241 1 wctdm24xxp
dahdi 228002 9
wctdm24xxp,wcaxx,dahdi_transcode,oct612x,dahdi_voicebus,wcb4xxp,wct4xxp,wcte43x,wcte13xp
crc_ccitt 12707 2 wctdm24xxp,dahdi
Is my timing OK - or not ?
Note /var/log/asterisk/messages says "nothing" about timing even though the
resourse were loaded.
Thoughts ?
Jerry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20221020/63d9b82b/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list