[asterisk-users] [External] [External] Asterisk 18.12.0 question

[Joshua C. Colp]

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 3:19 PM Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote:

> Thanks Joshua.
>
>
>
> I didn’t describe that very well.
>
>
>
> When I first noticed the res_http_transport_websocket wasn’t loading on
> that box, I compared the modules folder on both boxes.  My thought was I
> forgot some module that was required.
>
>
>
> I noticed I forgot to include these files, so I added them to the
> package.  Rolled back the VM and re-installed.  Didn’t make a difference
> whether they were present or not.
>
> /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.*
>
> /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_silk.*
>
> /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_siren14.*
>
> /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_siren7.*
>
> /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_ogg_opus.so
>
>
>
> Comparing the menuselect-tree between the two versions, only changes I see
> are
>
> func_evalexten
>
> res_aeap
>
> res_speech_aeap
>
> and four test_aeap_... added to the TEST_FRAMEWORK.
>
>
>
> Would it make sense for me to modify my bash script to disable those
> settings, compile, and try installing?  Bash script configures the
> menuselect options and compiles asterisk.
>
> Seems like that would be a better apples to apples comparison.
> Eliminating the new features.
>

You can. It would also make sense as a test to just not load chan_sip and
see what happens.

-- 
Joshua C. Colp
Asterisk Technical Lead
Sangoma Technologies
Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20220513/db1b3a56/attachment.html>