[asterisk-users] Asterisk 16, 9.0 - res_rtp_asterisk compilation error

[Administrator]

Le 13/03/2020 à 13:30, Joshua C. Colp a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM Administrator <admin at tootai.net 
> <mailto:admin at tootai.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     2 asterisk servers 16.8.0 version running on Debian 10.3 On one of
>     them,
>     I can't compile asterisk having error
>
>         [CC] res_rtp_asterisk.c -> res_rtp_asterisk.o
>     res_rtp_asterisk.c:2674:3: error: ‘pj_ice_sess_cb’ {aka ‘struct
>     pj_ice_sess_cb’} has no member named ‘on_valid_pair’
>        .on_valid_pair = ast_rtp_on_valid_pair,
>         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     res_rtp_asterisk.c:2674:19: warning: initialization of ‘void
>     (*)(pj_ice_sess *, pj_status_t)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct pj_ice_sess *,
>     int)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘void (*)(pj_ice_sess *)’ {aka
>     ‘void (*)(struct pj_ice_sess *)’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>        .on_valid_pair = ast_rtp_on_valid_pair,
>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     res_rtp_asterisk.c:2674:19: note: (near initialization for
>     ‘ast_rtp_ice_sess_cb.on_ice_complete’)
>     make[1]: *** [/usr/src/asterisk-16.9.0/Makefile.rules:164:
>     res_rtp_asterisk.o] Error 1
>     make: *** [Makefile:383: res] Error 2
>
>     I applied the patch and did make clean && ./configure
>     --with-pjproject-bundled && make which give this error. Openssl is
>     installed. On the other server there was no problem.
>
>     Any clue ?
>
>
> If you do "make distclean" and then rebuild does it resolve the 
> problem? Did you apply the patch to upgrade?
>
We a distclean it's OK despite the fact that we see error

    [CC] app_osplookup.c -> app_osplookup.o
app_osplookup.c: In function ‘osp_convert_inout.constprop’:
app_osplookup.c:1011:35: warning: ‘]:’ directive output may be truncated 
writing 2 bytes into a region of size between 0 and 255 
[-Wformat-truncation=]
       snprintf(dest, destsize, "[%s]:%s", buffer, port);
^~
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:873,
                  from 
/usr/src/asterisk-16.9.0/include/asterisk/compat.h:49,
                  from /usr/src/asterisk-16.9.0/include/asterisk.h:22,
                  from app_osplookup.c:37:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:67:10: note: 
‘__builtin___snprintf_chk’ output 4 or more bytes (assuming 259) into a 
destination of size 256
    return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
app_osplookup.c:1013:35: warning: ‘]’ directive output may be truncated 
writing 1 byte into a region of size between 0 and 255 
[-Wformat-truncation=]
       snprintf(dest, destsize, "[%s]", buffer);
^
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:873,
                  from 
/usr/src/asterisk-16.9.0/include/asterisk/compat.h:49,
                  from /usr/src/asterisk-16.9.0/include/asterisk.h:22,
                  from app_osplookup.c:37:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:67:10: note: 
‘__builtin___snprintf_chk’ output between 3 and 258 bytes into a 
destination of size 256
    return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Does it mean that we should always use distclean with the newer versions?

-- 
Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20200313/d1b20cf2/attachment.html>