[asterisk-users] problem with logger: syslog vs. file

[Steve Edwards]

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:

>> On 2020-06-03 17:21, Steve Edwards wrote:
>> 
>> How about:
>>
>>          syslog.local0                   = error,verbose,warning
>> 
>> no debugging detail.
>>
>>          syslog.local0                   = debug,error,verbose,warning
>> 
>> include debugging detail.
>
> currently, the above has no effect on logging.

Sorry. I guess I wasn't clear. I wasn't implying that the feature had 
already been implemented. I was replying to Tony's question 'should it be 
a configuration option in logger.conf whether they include or omit? if so, 
what should the default be, if not specified in logger.conf?'

I'm suggesting that if the 'debug' log level is specified, the debug 
detail (function name and line) should be included. Otherwise, not.

The 'debug' log level is 'already there' and it seems reasonable to me 
that if I'm deep enough into logging that I want debug level log messages 
that I'm probably also interested in logging debug details.

-- 
Thanks in advance,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Edwards       sedwards at sedwards.com      Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
             https://www.linkedin.com/in/steve-edwards-4244281