[asterisk-users] internal call record
Gokan Atmaca
linux.gokan at gmail.com
Sun Mar 10 09:08:35 CDT 2019
> Well, firstly, why are you using "_6001"? The leading underscore says "this is
> going to be a pattern match", but you then follow with a specific number, not a
> pattern. You might as well write just "6001" without the underscore, which is
> clearer to you and more efficient for Asterisk.
Hello
The total number of internal medicine is 6000-6020. When I do 6XXX
getting error. I did as follows. I think (*) there is a mistake
I am doing.
exten => 6XXX,1,NoOp()
exten => 6XXX,n,MixMonitor(${UNIQUEID}.wav,ab)
exten => 6XXX,n,Dial(SIP/${ARG2}/${ARG1},20) (*)
exten => 6XXX,n,StopMixMonitor()
exten => 6XXX,n,Hangup()
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:59 PM Antony Stone
<Antony.Stone at asterisk.open.source.it> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 10 March 2019 at 10:46:24, Gokan Atmaca wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Mynum: 6001 , Othernum: 6002.
> >
> >
> > I can record as follows.
>
> So, are you saying that this is the part which does work?
>
> We need to see the part which doesn't work as well, otherwise we have no idea
> what to suggest you change.
>
> > But I do not enter individual records for each internal required. I want to
> > do it more smoothly with a Macro.
>
> > exten => _6001,1,NoOp()
> > exten => _6001,n,MixMonitor(${UNIQUEID}.wav,ab)
> > exten => _6001,n,Dial(SIP/6001,20)
> > exten => _6001,n,StopMixMonitor()
> > exten => _6001,n,Hangup()
>
> Well, firstly, why are you using "_6001"? The leading underscore says "this is
> going to be a pattern match", but you then follow with a specific number, not a
> pattern. You might as well write just "6001" without the underscore, which is
> clearer to you and more efficient for Asterisk.
>
> Note: You don't need the StopMixMonitor() immediately preceding a Hangup() -
> it's done automatically when the call ends.
>
> Do all your internal extensions start with "600" (or maybe "60")?
>
> If so, have you tried the same dial plan but using "_600X" or "_60XX" as the
> extension match on every line (oh, and incidentally, you can say "same => n,"
> in place of "exten => _6000,n," on every line after the first one - this saves
> some typing, and also makes things a lot simpler if you decide you need to
> change the basic pattern match at some time in the future).
>
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 6:50 PM Doug Lytle wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:25 PM Antony Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > a) work for recording incoming / outgoing calls
> > >
> > > b) do not work for recording internal calls
> > >
> > > then we might be able to give you a clue what's wrong.
> > >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > For example: My phone number is 1000, the other's number is 1001. These
> > > numbers are in the same PBX (asterisk). I want 1000, 1001
> > >
> > >
> > > Gokan,
> > >
> > >
> > > Since you've said that outside calls can be recorded, but not inside
> > > calls; Antony requested that you show us your dialplan code for
> > > recordings that work. This will give us an idea of what might be going
> > > wrong when trying to record inside calls.
> > >
> > > It would also be helpful to see your console output when things are not
> > > working.
> > >
> > > Doug
>
> --
> How does an Israeli man make tea? Hebrews it.
>
> Please reply to the list;
> please *don't* CC me.
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/
>
> New to Asterisk? Start here:
> https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list