[asterisk-users] Is Confbridge performance < Meetme performance

[Johan Wilfer]

Ok, let med rephrase this:

Does anyone actually uses Confbridge and what are your experiences?
How about local channels in combination with Confbridge?

/Johan

Den 2015-09-23 kl. 13:37, skrev Johan Wilfer:
> Hi!
>
> I did some tests with Asterisk 11.19.0 and Confbridge. I've wanting to
> migrate from Meetme to Confbridge for a long time now.
>
> For two participants in a conference - one actual call and one local
> channel that are recording - the cpu sits at 20%. The result was the
> same with res_timing_pthread and res_timing_timerfd. For 15 calls the
> cpu sits at 200%. (res_timing_pthread)
>
> This is a Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz server, and with Meetme/Dahdi the load
> for this was hardly noticeable.
>
> Kernel: 2.6.32-openvz-042stab111.11-amd64, Debian 7 OpenVZ HN, with
> Debian 7 VE. And as I said - with Meetme in the same server you can
> barley notice the load. And with Confbridge it jumps to 20%...
>
> Any idea why Confbridge comes with such a performance hit?
>
> /Johan
>
>