[asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

[Mike Leddy]

Hi Russ,

Sorry I didn't send that... Here's a few runs:

# cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc && sleep 1 && cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc
  28:    1682906          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp
  28:    1683913          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp

= 1007

# cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc && sleep 1 && cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc
  28:    1690587          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp
  28:    1691594          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp

= 1007

# cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc && sleep 1 && cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc
  28:    1695091          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp
  28:    1696100          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp

= 1009

# cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc && sleep 1 && cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc
  28:    1700363          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp
  28:    1701370          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi   wcte11xp

= 1007


Best regards,

Mike

On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 10:13 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:

> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Mike Leddy <mike at loop.com.br> wrote:
> --- Results after 72 passes ---
>         Best: 99.401% -- Worst: 69.357% -- Average: 90.260025%
>         Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 92.402
>         
>         I suspect it may not be good enough yet for production but a
>         step in the right direction :-)
>         
> 
> What was the result of the /proc/interrupt test? How many interrupts did the te110 fire in 1 second?
> What happens if you rmmod the wct1xxp driver and ran dahdi_test against just dahdi & dahdi_dummy modules?
>  
> -- 
> Russ Meyerriecks
> Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> direct: +1 256-428-6025
> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
> 


On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 10:13 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Mike Leddy <mike at loop.com.br> wrote:
>         --- Results after 72 passes ---
>         Best: 99.401% -- Worst: 69.357% -- Average: 90.260025%
>         Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 92.402
>         
>         I suspect it may not be good enough yet for production but a
>         step in the right direction :-)
> 
> 
> What was the result of the /proc/interrupt test? How many interrupts did the te110 fire in 1 second?
> What happens if you rmmod the wct1xxp driver and ran dahdi_test against just dahdi & dahdi_dummy modules?
>  
> -- 
> Russ Meyerriecks
> Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> direct: +1 256-428-6025
> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org