[asterisk-users] Is this big of new modification in Asterisk Events Objects values ?

[Paul Belanger]

On 13-10-25 07:06 AM, virendra bhati wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Thanks for your great job an Asterisk new features developments. I
> installed asterisk-12 Beta and found some changes as well which i notice to
> put in-front of your knowledge, don't know that bug of new modification
> into objects or old version (asterisk-11) mistake corrected that time,
> anyway
>
> *Asterisk-12:*
>
> Array
> (
> [Event] => ConfbridgeMute
> [Privilege] => call,all
> [Conference] => 42
> [BridgeUniqueid] => 9f2ae5df-0749-4494-b8b7-12eb50dc765d
> [BridgeType] => base
> [BridgeTechnology] => softmix
> [BridgeNumChannels] => 2
> [Channel] => SIP/5000-00000006
> [ChannelState] => 6
> [ChannelStateDesc] => Up
> *[CallerIDNum] => 5000*
> [CallerIDName] => 5000
> [ConnectedLineNum] => <unknown>
> [ConnectedLineName] => <unknown>
> [AccountCode] =>
> [Context] => from-sip
> [Exten] => 1234
> [Priority] => 3
> [Uniqueid] => 1382599433.22
> )
>
> Please check the BOLD section. earlier is was  *[CallerIDnum]
>
> *
> *So 'n' is now 'N'
> *
>
Asterisk AMI got basically a rewrite[1] of how it works, so there are 
some breaking changes moving forward.

Read ChangeLog and UPGRADE.txt in the source tree for more information.


[1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/AMI+1.4+Specification




-- 
Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc.
Jabber: paul.belanger at polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode)
Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: 
https://twitter.com/pabelanger