[asterisk-users] is g729 codec free? or under license???

Asghar Mohammad asghar144 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 12 04:38:58 CDT 2013


HI,
You don't need a g729 installed in pass throw mode. if both ends have codec
g729 you can just enable on both peers.
and asterisk should pass the codec from 1 end to other.
but make sure you are not doing transcoding of any type answering the call
playing voice prompts etc.



On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 9:52 AM, s m <sam.gh1986 at gmail.com> wrote:

> thank you everybody for your useful replies and so sorry to answer late.
>
> i understand what i need. first of all, i wanna to use pass through g729
> codec  (which is free). so i go to http://asterisk.hosting.lv/ to get
> g729 codec. i have freebsd 8.2 and asterisk 1.8.22 but there is no
> compatible codec for Xeon Intel in the list. it means that i can't use
> codec g729 on my system??? or can i use codec for another type of hardware
> for my system? anyone has any experience?
>
> thanks in advance
> SAM
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:04 PM, John Novack <jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Darryl Moore wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Steve, and I read a bit more on the web on this subject
>>> including your own well reasoned page at
>>> http://www.soft-switch.org/**patents/index.html<http://www.soft-switch.org/patents/index.html>
>>>
>>> However, despite wide acceptance of the patentability of such codecs
>>> (unfortunately), whether they are in fact software patents or not
>>> appears to be a matter of opinion. The FSF and Fedora both refer to
>>> codec patents as being software patents.
>>>
>>> http://endsoftpatents.org/**2011/02/usa-patent-reform-not-**enough/<http://endsoftpatents.org/2011/02/usa-patent-reform-not-enough/>
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Software_Patents<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Software_Patents>
>>>
>>> A quick google search of both terms will show that there are a great
>>> many people who see codec patents as software patents, so I don't think
>>> I am alone there.
>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Law is ALWAYS open to interpretation, so that is not surprising.
>> See if you can get any lawyer, and especially a patent attorney, to give
>> you a definitive answer! You will not get one.
>> Seldom will you ever get an "eggspurt legal opinion" Any good lawyer will
>> tell you "maybe", or if there is any doubt don't do it!
>> Law is not precisely measurable. No meter or O'scope to assist here.
>> Any A**hole can sue anyone for the filing fee, and the results are up to
>> the opinion of a judge or jury.
>> The lawyers want it that way, so it isn't ever going to be any different.
>>
>> John Novack
>>
>> --
>>
>> Dog is my Co-pilot
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ______________________________**______________________________**_________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**users<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>
>>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>                http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131012/92964c8b/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list