[asterisk-users] Optimizing Asterisk Environment
Nick Khamis
symack at gmail.com
Sat Mar 23 14:21:29 CDT 2013
Hello Gentlemen,
Thank you so much for your responses. We have been working on a
SIP/RTP Proxy+Asterisk in backed by MySQL for a few weeks. Everything
is working nicely I am pleased to say. And will be making some
donations for G729 licenses etc.. (it's the least we can do to support
the cause).
Speaking about transcoding cards. We are functioning 100% on SIP using
u/alaw and eventually G729. Some typical observations being great
performance when not using G729 :)...
Is there any transcoding happening when using only G729 and no other
codec? We tried "disallow=all" and "allow=g729" and judging by the CPU
load "260%" there seems to be...
I hope this is not a silly question, but if we force the DID reseller
to send only G729 encoded media, our asterisk server only allows G729,
and finally for termination most sip trunk providers have g729 in
there list of supported codecs, would there still be transcoding
happening on our * box? I hope this is not as silly question as I
think....
To answer your question, we also tried with only ulaw and alaw and we
seem to be stuck on exactly 101 peak. Is there a "limit" setting
hidden in one of the "*.conf" files?
We let sipp run for almost 3 hours on our box, from another local
computer using the following command:
<extensions.conf>
exten => 1002,1,Answer
exten => 1002,n,Goto(demo,s,1)
exten => 1002,n,Hangup
./sipp -sn uac -d 10000 -s 1002 test.example.com -l 200 -mp 5606:
And we got the following results: http://pastebin.com/J0YCprCb
At 9.4 cps 96963 calls were executed with 0 failed calls. Where is the
concurrent call figure in this tool? Please forgive me still getting
use to it :).
In regards to hardware transcoding cards for SIP protocol. Please let
us know of some digium solutions. Again, we would love to support the
cause.
Nick.
On 3/23/13, Andrew Latham <lathama at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote:
>> Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh no secret. Some things I do is increase the ulimit size. I was
>>> wondering if there was a way to increase allocated memory. I have been
>>> reading about a -p option but when I start asterisk using "asterisk -p
>>> -10" it does not accept it but "asterisk -p 10" works fine. Not sure
>>> if that was the intended new value.
>>>
>>> Also, I just want to mention I am not trying to break any records.
>>> Just would like to get a ~200 concurrent call stable environment using
>>> G729 out of our setup.
>>
>>
>> Are you transcoding? If so then that is where most of your CPU is going,
>> and
>> the only option to make it go further is to use a hardware transcoding
>> solution.
>>
>> --
>> Joshua Colp
>> Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
>> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
>> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
>
> +1 on hardware card. There are various other tools, even a network
> based encoding solution. Offloading to hardware can show you how
> stable/strong your system might already be.
>
> --
> ~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lathama at gmail.com http://lathama.net ~
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
> http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list