[asterisk-users] How does Asterisk handle ACK's?

[Grant Bagdasarian]

The problem seems to have been fixed with version 11.2.1. The ACK is now correctly sent to the address in the Contact header of the 200 OK.

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Grant Bagdasarian
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:43 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How does Asterisk handle ACK's?

I'm going to try the new version first, version 11.

I've never reported a bug, but if version 11 fixes the problem, should I still report it?

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com<mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olle E. Johansson
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:08 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How does Asterisk handle ACK's?


12 mar 2013 kl. 16:54 skrev Grant Bagdasarian <GB at cm.nl<mailto:GB at cm.nl>>:

Hello,

I'm noticing strange behavior in one of our Asterisk nodes where the ACK is always sent to the proxy, but RR is not enabled for calls.
The proxy drops the ACK.

I'm using the AMI interface to originate a call:
Action: login
Username: myusername
Secret: mypassword
Events: on

Action: Originate
Channel: SIP/<SOMENUMBER>@proxy1
CallerID: <SOMENUMBER>
Application: Playback
Data: hello-world

Using Asterisk 10.5.0.

Shouldn't Asterisk send the ACK directly to the endpoint in the Contact header?
Yes it should. File a bug report with details.

/O
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130313/4faedbd2/attachment.htm>