[asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay

[Eric Wieling]

I imagine setting up a catch-all extension pattern is your best option.  That is what most seem people do.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:51 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay

Okay, so I is no good.  Does anybody else have a work-around for this?

-Justin

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:43 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay

"I" has the same limitations as dialplan timeouts, you have to be in a Background or WaitExten or similar for them to work.    These items are designed for IVRS.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:40 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay

It seems likely that this is exactly what is happening.  I'd rather not change the code though, but rather fix the dialplan.  I'm thinking using the 'i' extension would work just the same - would there be a reason to use a wildcard pattern match instead of i?

-Justin

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:12 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] analog phone digit delay