[asterisk-users] [webrtc] Received SAVPF profle in audio offer but AVPF is not enabled
Joshua Colp
jcolp at digium.com
Mon Apr 1 15:06:27 CDT 2013
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Thanks for the fast reply. I agree backporting full support for AVPF
> would not be justified for many use cases (including my own). What I
> was more curious about is whether the F can be tolerated (in other
> words, ignored or silently removed), as described here:
From a code perspective, it could. Still not something I would be
comfortable with putting in Asterisk 1.8.
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg01145.html
> "1) RTCWEB end-point will always signal AVPF or SAVPF. I signalling
> gateway to legacy will change that by removing the F to AVP or SAVP."
>
> and whether such behavior is possible even without setting avpf=yes on a
> per-peer basis?
This is fine for incoming but what about outgoing to a device?
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list