[asterisk-users] Peculiar problem with failover provision.

[Logan Bibby]

Why not use the DIALSTATUS channel variable to determine if a fail over is
necessary?

- Logan
On Sep 24, 2012 6:00 AM, "Thomas Kenyon" <digium at sanguinarius.co.uk> wrote:

> I have noticed a peculiar problem recently with the way that the failover
> operates in my dialplan.
>
> I normally have:
>
>         1,Dial(SIP/<provider-1>/**extension)
>         n,Dial(SIP/<provider-2>/**extension)
>
> (or something similar).
>
> This has up until now worked flawlessly.
>
> If there is an error with the first provider, the call is completed with
> the second one.
>
> Now, what is happening is, if the remote party hags up first, then the
> call progresses to the next priority and re-dials them.
>
> Is this a change in default behaviour?
> Do I need to add a particular flag / config directive to my dialplan
>
> I am running Asterisk 10.6.0.
>
> Thanks for any help in solving this.
>
> --
> ______________________________**______________________________**_________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**users<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120924/9aa34397/attachment.htm>