[asterisk-users] Common/Reasonable Assumption on DID/Channel over-subscription

[Don Kelly]

I don't think it's possible to suggest a ratio without knowing what your
actual application "similar to calling card services" is.

--Don

Don Kelly

PCF Corp
People Come First
651 842-1000
651 842-1001 fax

 

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of A E [Gmail]
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:13 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion; FreeSWITCH
Users Help
Subject: [asterisk-users] Common/Reasonable Assumption on DID/Channel
over-subscription

 

Hello All,

 

just throwing this out there. What are people generally using these days
when designing their services, esp. those that require a user to call a DID
to access their system, similar to calling card services. There was a time
when this used to be 50 to 1 for DIDs, and about 10 to 1 for number of
channels bought in SMB with IP-PBX. 

 

I believe this would have changed today and assuming a service is pretty
popular, the ALOCs are longer due to cheaper rates and convenience of
calling. Does anyone have any real world numbers they can share? Is 10 to 1
a good ratio to ensure a user practically never gets a "circuits are busy"?

 

Thanks in advance

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120526/d4bf271e/attachment.htm>