[asterisk-users] Executing Script after MixMonitor is called

[David Backeberg]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Steve Edwards
<asterisk.org at sedwards.com> wrote:
> The OP was using MIXMONITOR_EXEC (although I wonder about the '&&' syntax)
> so he doesn't need to explicitly execute (via system()) his commands.

Wow. Never knew that was possible. I still don't like the syntax, but
good to know.

For optimal debugging, I would suggest OP not try to build the
pyramids with a single line of commands joined by ampersands, but
rather do a separate System() call for either doing my script idea or
doing the individual commands in multiple separate System() calls.