[asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch

[Sammy Govind]

Wow,
I bet even asterisk developers wouldn't believe so. What have they done !.
No, actually can you tell if server was processing media along with the
calls as well !?

I once tested without media and really I had some 1000+ CCs on asterisk
server on a regular dev machine with choppy audio on an actual call  while
still under stress.

Kindly please confirm your stats.

Regards,
Sammy

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Stefan Schmidt <sst at sil.at> wrote:

> Am 07.02.12 12:38, schrieb virendra bhati:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Why FreeSwitch can handle more then 1,000CC and asterisk only 25CC ? What
> > technology FreeSwitch is used and asterisk don't. I don't know it's the
> > right or wrong but this question come to my mind...
> >
> I had done some load tests with asterisk 10 and my highest results was:
>
> 1750 calls per seconds up to
> 13000 concurrent calls
>
> done on a intel xeon with dual six core and hyperthreading (= 24 cores)
> and 12 GB ram. the sysload was around 2.5 during this test.
>
> so i am not impressed by 1000 concurrent calls.
>
> best regards
>
> stefan
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120209/06863a1f/attachment.htm>