[asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch

[Frank Church]

Freeswitch was engineered from scratch by some Asterisk developers who
wanted to start afresh on a cleaner programming base. Asterisk is like
Topsy, She just growed and had to maintain backward compatibility.

The latest versions of Asterisk are reported to be much improved in that
respect.

On 7 February 2012 15:40, Gilles <codecomplete at free.fr> wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:08:18 +0530, virendra bhati <virbhati at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >Why FreeSwitch can handle more then 1,000CC and asterisk only 25CC ? What
> >technology FreeSwitch is used and asterisk don't. I don't know it's the
> >right or wrong but this question come to my mind...
>
> Provided Asterisk, even in release 1.8 or 10, does handle much fewer
> concurrent calls than Freeswitch, you might find the answer in those
> articles:
>
> "How does FreeSWITCH compare to Asterisk?"
> www.freeswitch.org/node/117
>
> "Asterisk vs FreeSWITCH"
> www.richappsconsulting.com/blog/blog-detail/asterisk-vs-freeswitch/
>
> "Asterisk vs. FreeSWITCH"
> www.anders.com/cms/266
>
> "Open Source VoIP: Asterisk or FreeSwitch?"
> www.zdnet.com/blog/greenfield/open-source-voip-asterisk-or-freeswitch/233
>
> "FreeSwitch vs Asterisk"
> www.dslreports.com/forum/r23246683-FreeSwitch-vs-Asterisk
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120207/44e682c0/attachment.htm>