[asterisk-users] Suggestion of Server Specifications for Asterisk

[Shahid H]

I have bought a new server today:

i7-2600 CPU, 8GB and 2 x 256GB SSDs.  100Mbit Connection.

I hope CPU is powerful enough for 200 concurrent calls.


On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Michelle Dupuis <mdupuis at ocg.ca> wrote:

>  That's how we do it - write to a memory based (ramdisk) disk then write
> to HDD upon call completion.  We haven't tried a SSD but that may be
> necessary depending on your call volumes.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Wagoner [
> rswagoner at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 04, 2012 7:34 PM
> *To:* Asterisk Users List
> *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Suggestion of Server Specifications for
> Asterisk
>
>   On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Shahid H <shahidh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Instead of buying expensive disk.. I might setup a ramdisk (about 2GB) to
>> do 200 calls recordings.
>>
>>  Once the call hangup/completed it will then move recording file to SATA
>> HDD.
>>
>>  What do you think of this?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> You want some form of raid for redundancy. I usually go with two 15K SAS
> drives in raid 1 or four 7.2k SATA drives in raid 10. Performance between
> the two should be similar. With drives being as cheap as they are skip raid
> 5.
>
> Ryan
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>                http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120806/5b657808/attachment.htm>