[asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3 or init level 5 ?
Robert Huddleston
rhuddleston at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 13:24:28 CDT 2011
I personally would never install a GUI o/s. By doing so you always open
yourself up to more security concerns.. Packages / ports / etc.
Course one might argue - "it's behind a firewall"..
In my professional experience with running numerous ISP and VoITSPs the rule
has always been install the minimum needed software to accomplish the goal.
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of linux guy
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 2:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk server: Console or GUI OS ? Init level 3
or init level 5 ?
I'm about to start building my asterisk server and I can't seem to find
anything that discusses the pros and cons of installing the OS (Fedora 15)
as console only or GUI, ie install KDE as well.
So, other than a bit of disk space, is there any reason why I shouldn't
install KDE when I set it up ?
Is there any great disadvantage to running the server in init level 5 (ie
KDE, xorg, etc) running in the background, but not being logged in, versus
init level 3 ? (Or whatever they call these things these days..., ie F15
uses systemd...)
FWIW, my server hardware will sit on a server rack in the utility room. I
might drag a display and keyboard down there once in a while to troubleshoot
and/or do maintenance, but mostly I'd ssh in and probably use a remote
desktop app to work on it.
FWIW, I'm OK doing things via the CLI, but sometimes its really nice to have
graphical tools.
I look forward to your input.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110912/61a5c730/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list