[asterisk-users] Jitter only affecting meetme - and echo testing

[JT]

1 - Version: 1.8.4.1 (could this be my issue??)
2 - I began building/testing 1.8 prior to 10.0 being released (pretty much
when 1.8.4.1 was released).  As 10 is still in beta, I'm more concerned with
using it than 1.8.... as I've worked out all issues with the build, except
the jitter and these boxes are destined for production use.

Thanks!

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com> wrote:

> **1.       **What version of 1.8 (known issues with some branches)****
>
> **2.       **Why not 10.0?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *JT
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:52 PM
> *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Jitter only affecting meetme - and echo
> testing****
>
> ** **
>
> Greetings List!****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm currently rolling out a new deployment of Asterisk 1.8 to replace
> existing 1.2 servers...and have run into an issue which could use your
> assistance!****
>
> ** **
>
> For testing I have trunked (iax2) two of the servers - one running 1.8 and
> the other at 1.2.  Calls placed from SIP --> SIP sound fantastic and crystal
> clear.  However, when I place a echo test call (*43) from 1.8 to 1.2 the
> result is a pulsing echo and garbled audio.  The same result is found when
> dialing into a meetme conference being held on 1.2 from the 1.8 server.***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> I know that the jitter buffer has gone through quite a bit of work since
> 1.2 but my results at this point seem to indicate 1.8 is actually worse than
> 1.2.  ****
>
> I've also trunked together two 1.8 boxes (physical locations are in
> different countries), to rule out if 1.2 was somehow causing the extra
> jitter.  My results were identical - echo testing/meetme from 1.8 to 1.8
> resulted in the same audio issues.****
>
> ** **
>
> The new servers are in the same locations as our production units, using
> the same networks/etc... so I expected identical results between them, not
> for 1.8 to be substantially worse.****
>
> ** **
>
> Any recommendations?  Has anyone else experienced a similar issue and if
> so, perhaps you could share your experience.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks!****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110908/b6ad68f9/attachment.htm>