[asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg callgenerated by a call file.

Danny Nicholas danny at debsinc.com
Thu Mar 17 08:48:32 CDT 2011


  _____  

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk Man
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:27 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg
callgenerated by a call file.

 

Thanks buddy,
But I think, AMD helps when I call customer first and then SIP extension.
Any other suggestion!

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com> wrote:

  _____  

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk Man
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:13 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Answering machine detection for a second leg
callgenerated by a call file.

 

Hi Group,

I have following case scenario.

Through call file, Asterisk makes a call to  SIP extension. When Extension
answers the call, Asterisk reads customer numbers (set in callfile) and
calls them one by one untill one of the customers answeres the call. Here
customer and SIP extension gets patched and talk to each other.

Now if outgoing call is answered by Answering machine,I don't want asterisk
to patch it up with SIP extension. Please suggest me how this can be
achieved. 

Thanking you in advance.
--AM

 

May or may not help - google for "Asterisk AMD"


- round 2 -

 

You could use the "privacy" setting on dial, so the end user has to press 1
to accept the call?

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110317/bb1e9522/attachment.htm>


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list