[asterisk-users] Multiple SIP endpoint registrations

[Olle E. Johansson]

16 mar 2011 kl. 14.13 skrev Benny Amorsen:

> "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming at digium.com> writes:
> 
>> Why do you need a Local channel to do this? If extension 234 exists in
>> some context, the Dial() statement in that extension can dial
>> SIP/234-foo and SIP/234-bar itself.
> 
> Good point.
> 
> It can be a bit of fun keeping track of the phones when they are
> added to or removed from queues, and the owner expects both of them to be
> added/removed at the same time. It is still doable without Local channels.
> 
> Once you need to do manipulation of calls before passing them on to the
> phone (change callerid individually, handle tT options etc.), Local is
> unavoidable, but at that point multiple registrations would not work
> either.

We also need to adopt SIP headers depending on device - so we need a dial per device, not one combined.

/O