[asterisk-users] sig_pri.c:985 pri_find_dchan: Span 1: No D-channels available! Using Primary channel as D-channel anyway!

[bilal ghayyad]

Dear;

Thanks a lot for guiding me.

Is it possible that the installation libpri-1.4.11.5 newer than the libpri-1.4.11.5-patch?

Well, when I typed (note: I am trying to apply the libpri-1.4.11.5-patch for the libpri-1.4.11.5):

libpri-1.4.11.5# patch -p0 -i libpri-1.4.11.5-patch

It gave me that patched detected as shown below (example of one file, and I got same for other files):

patching file pri.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R?

And when I reached to the q931, then it failed to save and apply the hunk !! 


patching file q931.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 601 (offset 280 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 4945.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 4957.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 4973.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 5001.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 5303.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 5319.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 5817.
Hunk #9 FAILED at 5830.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 6085.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 6236.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 6379.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 6447.
Hunk #14 FAILED at 6635.
Hunk #15 FAILED at 7287.
Hunk #16 FAILED at 7320.
Hunk #17 FAILED at 7332.
Hunk #18 FAILED at 7426.
Hunk #19 FAILED at 7991.
Hunk #20 FAILED at 8029.
Hunk #21 FAILED at 8077.
Hunk #22 FAILED at 8096.
21 out of 22 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file q931.c.rej

What this mean? The installation libpri-1.4.11.5 already contains the libpri-1.4.11.5-patch and the install libpri-1.4.11.5 already newer than the libpri-1.4.11.5-patch? So it failed to apply the changes to the q931 file?

As I see that I am facing a problem with applying the patch to the q931 while at the same time the D-channel is related to the q931, so it could seriously a bug?

I am now confused, not able to know if the installation newer than the patch or I am missing something in doing the patch?

In case the installation newer than the patch, so I will resolve my problem? Shall I come back for previous version or I have to go for beta version :( !!

Please help.

Regards
Bilal

----------------
 
> 
> http://www.linuxtutorialblog.com/post/introduction-using-diff-and-patch-tutorial
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com]
> On Behalf Of
> > bilal ghayyad
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 2:47 PM
> > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] sig_pri.c:985
> pri_find_dchan:
> > Span 1: D-chanannel anyway!
> >
> > Dears;
> >
> > To patch libpri: I just place the patch file in the
> libpri
> > source directory and then I run make and make
> install?
> >
> > Or I need to compile the dahdi and asterisk also?
> >
> > If the problem stayed, do I have to go for previous
> libpri
> > version? Or for previous dahdi version and asterisk
> version?
> >
> > Regards
> > Bilal
> >
> > -----------
> >
> > > bilal ghayyad wrote:
> > > > But I am afraid it is a bug because I read
> something
> > > this in the below
> > >
> > > This bug is referring to Zaptel, not dahdi.
> > >
> > > If things were working fine, and you haven't made
> any
> > > recent changes, in
> > > my experience it's always been provider (99%) or
> cable (1%)
> > > issues when
> > > I've lost my D channel.
> > >
> > > Doug
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > You know I'm a flight engineer but non of the
> airlines
> > > wanted to hire
> > > me because other than the self proclaimed title I
> have no
> > > clue how to
> > > operate or maintain an aircraft.
> > > The dictionary is probably wrong you should patch
> libpri
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM, bilal ghayyad
> > <bilmar_gh at yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > The provider came to the site and they have
> a gateway,
> > > they connected the gateway to the E1 cable, and
> we called
> > > the number and it answered !!!
> > > >
> > > > So it is no more provider issue.
> > > >
> > > > I start beleive, it is a bug maybe in the
> dahdi and
> > > libpri. I tried all the possibilities, but no
> luck.
> > > >
> > > > WHAT COULD BE?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Bilal
> > > > ------------------
> >