[asterisk-users] NAT yes

Robert Huddleston rhuddleston at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 08:30:43 CDT 2011


Also consider the setting localnet in sip.conf

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:24 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] NAT yes

On 07/26/2011 09:19 AM, Flavio Miranda wrote:

> In a no natted environment if I letnat=yes on sip.conf it would
> cause some thing bad or it is irrelevant ? Anybody know ?

There is no harm unless the endpoint you are dealing with does not do 
symmetric RTP.  The nat=yes option assumes that it is okay to send RTP 
back to the source port from which it originated, irrespectively of 
what's in the SDP.  This will cause one-way audio if the endpoint 
happens to want to receive RTP on a different port than the one it is 
sending it from.

Almost all endpoints these days do symmetric RTP, though, so it's not 
a huge concern.

That said, from a methodological and aesthetic perspective, it is 
better not to break standard RFC-compliant behaviour unnecessarily. 
Thus, I would not enable nat=yes unless there really is no direct 
network and transport-layer reachability to the endpoint.

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list