[asterisk-users] NAT yes
Robert Huddleston
rhuddleston at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 08:30:43 CDT 2011
Also consider the setting localnet in sip.conf
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:24 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] NAT yes
On 07/26/2011 09:19 AM, Flavio Miranda wrote:
> In a no natted environment if I letnat=yes on sip.conf it would
> cause some thing bad or it is irrelevant ? Anybody know ?
There is no harm unless the endpoint you are dealing with does not do
symmetric RTP. The nat=yes option assumes that it is okay to send RTP
back to the source port from which it originated, irrespectively of
what's in the SDP. This will cause one-way audio if the endpoint
happens to want to receive RTP on a different port than the one it is
sending it from.
Almost all endpoints these days do symmetric RTP, though, so it's not
a huge concern.
That said, from a methodological and aesthetic perspective, it is
better not to break standard RFC-compliant behaviour unnecessarily.
Thus, I would not enable nat=yes unless there really is no direct
network and transport-layer reachability to the endpoint.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list