[asterisk-users] res_fax

[Bryant Zimmerman]

----------------------------------------
 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming at digium.com>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 5:13 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax

On 01/31/2011 02:08 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming at digium.com>
> *Sent*: Thursday, January 27, 2011 3:08 PM
> *To*: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> *Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] res_fax
>
> On 01/27/2011 09:21 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
>>
>> > Kevin
>> >
>> > That is grate. I dove into the code and tried to add it my self I 
added
>> > a F option but I have not figured out the right spot to force the
>> > exclusion to shut off the T38.
>> >
>> > Where will the patch be posted?
>>
>> http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=rev&rev=304342
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> I tried everthing I could think of to get the n option to work last
>> night but it would not do a complete shut off of the T.38 option and
>> would not receive a fax. What do you need from me on the debug side so 
I
>> can help you get it working as expected?
>
> Revision 304599 should fix this (and I also changed the option letter
> from 'n' to 'F' since it really means 'force audio').
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> Kevin
>
> The 304599 rev does seem to work good. I just finished my testing on it
> and the F option works great.
> I have three more test to do and if they pass it should be good to go.
> When could it get into the releases?

It's a new feature, so it won't go into any existing release branches; 
the first release that will have this addition is Asterisk 1.10.1. Of 
course, the patch is quite small as you've seen, so it will be easy for 
you to apply it to your installations.

 _____________________________________________________________________

Kevin

I just replaced the res_fax.c file with the one from 304599. Would I just 
keep doing that as I step forward on versions of 1.8.x?
If this is the case how would I get any other critical changes to res_fax.c 
that may occur after rev 304599?
How would I create a patch that would allow me to apply it to additional 
release version of asterisk.
Sorry for the simple questions I do most of my dev on windows machines and 
this process is a still a bit confusing to me.

Thanks
Bryant

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110131/260fc4f6/attachment.htm>