[asterisk-users] Reducing number of Asterisk processes?

[Gordon Henderson]

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Tilghman Lesher wrote:

> By the way, you are likely to have trouble running Asterisk on uClinux,
> anyway.  There are a lot of assumptions in the code related to fork(2)
> creating a separate address space.  As this is not true with vfork(2),
> there are parts of Asterisk that will mysteriously fail.  Unless you are
> comfortable delving into the C code and working on these issues, uClinux
> will probably never be an appropriate system for you with which to run
> Asterisk.

I understand the Atcom range of commercial Asterisk products all run under 
uClinux... E.G.

   http://www.atcom.cn/IP01.html

and the others in their range.

I was assuming this was that the OP had and what he was refering to...

Gordon