[asterisk-users] Internode weirdness

[Da Rock]

On 01/21/11 20:28, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/21/11 03:19, Tom Rymes wrote:
>> On 01/19/2011 10:34 PM, Da Rock wrote:
>>
>>> WARNING[988]: chan_sip.c:19069 handle_response_invite: Re-invite to
>>> non-existing call leg on other UA. SIP dialog
>>> '481cf0543743e6bb7006991d409ed3bc at 150.101.178.33:5060'. Giving up.
>>
>> Have you tried disallowing re-invites?
> Sorry for the delay, but I've tried both yes and no- one of the first 
> things I tried, but I get your reasoning.
>
> Thanks
Some more information has come to light- bit of luck this clue happen to 
come to my attention: My provider could be using a Broadworks system. 
Does that change things much?

In my sip debug for the peer it flashed up realm="Broadworks" from the peer.