[asterisk-users] Same extension registering over eth0 and eth1

[Rob Coward]

Any reason you cant change the asterisk server to bond the 2 nics
together ? We use bonded nics a lot to provide resilient networks, and as
far as any apps on the server are concerned, you are only talking to a
single interface bond0 instead of eth0 and eth1. 

Rob 

On Mon, 18 Oct
2010 17:03:45 -0400, Zeeshan Zakaria  wrote:  

I didn't design the
network, it was already here at clien't site. It is designed for
redundancy. I am trying to come up with a solution to make asterisk work in
it. I am looking into opensips how it can help me. 

Zeeshan A Zakaria


--
www.ilovetovoip.com [1] 

  On 2010-10-18 5:00 PM, "Paul Belanger" 
wrote:

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Zeeshan Zakaria  wrote:
 > Will
OpenSIPs do the ... Any proxy would work, however I would re think your
network design.

 Re-registering the same phone, with the same extension,
on the same
 PBX is asking for trouble. If you want to do redundancy, I
would set
 your network so only one ethernet route is active at one time,
then it
 is a matter or routing. If you want both ethernet ports active,
then
 you are doing load balancing. Something Asterisk by itself is not

strong at. Hence the SIP proxy or DNS SRV records.

 --

Paul Belanger |
dCAP
Polybeacon | Consultant
Jabber: paul.belanger at polybeacon.com [4] |
IRC: pabelanger ...  

Links:
------
[1] http://www.ilovetovoip.com
[2]
mailto:paul.belanger at polybeacon.com
[3] mailto:zishanov at gmail.com
[4]
mailto:paul.belanger at polybeacon.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20101022/7059b53b/attachment-0001.htm