[asterisk-users] Why doesn't Asterisk project document certain important features of Asterisk officially?

[Warren Selby]

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Tilghman Lesher <tlesher at digium.com>wrote:

> On Wednesday 24 November 2010 11:07:40 Bruce B wrote:
> > This is not to bash the Asterisk project or Digium. Don't respond if you
> > have a difference of opinion as I am not looking for personal opinions
> > but rather JUST WONDERING THE TECHNICAL/TACTICAL CAUSE of not
> > documenting thing that are really hidden from the community and one has
> > to go through a much manual process to find out about.
>
> It's not a tactical or even a conscious decision.  The documentation arose
> at voip-info organically, from the days when there was only a single
> committer to Asterisk.  There's never been much of a coordinated attempt
> to replace that resource, mostly due to the large amount of labor that we
> would need.  There are certainly efforts to document Asterisk and keep the
> documentation up to date (see the Asterisk Documentation Project).
> Anything that you would like to contribute in this regard would be welcome.
>

I thought that's what http://wiki.asterisk.org was supposed to be for....?

-- 
Thanks,
--Warren Selby, dCAP
http://www.selbytech.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20101124/43dd367f/attachment.htm