[asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

[unserossi at aol.com]

I just did not want to spam the list with useless content but just reply to you as you attacked me.
This was the reason i only replied to you and not to the whole list.
But as i realised now it seems to be usual to spam the whole mailing list with useless information like your mail (or this mail from me) instead of concentrating on the "real" topic, e.g. "Remote Party ID issue".





-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Howes <steve-lists at geekinter.net>
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 2:15 pm
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue



n 2 Jul 2010, at 12:29, John Novack wrote:
 regardless, people will post either way, and wasting archive space 
 complaining about either one is pointless.
I was mainly pissed off about him directly replying to people (i.e. me) rather 
han the list. <troll> It was you lot that started the religious war .</troll>
S
- 
____________________________________________________________________
- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
ew to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
o UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100702/3cb56a66/attachment-0001.htm