[asterisk-users] Use of "603 Declined"

[Fred Posner]

On Jan 29, 2010, at 5:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:

> 
> 29 jan 2010 kl. 10.25 skrev Alex Balashov:
> 
>> I don't know about 4xx, but 503 would be more benign for general/ 
>> miscellaneous errors than 603.
> 503 indicates that there's a problem with the server, so that's not a good replacement.
> 
> We're sending this when there's a failed call, in most cases because of the outbound channel failure without a proper hangup cause being set in that channel driver (may very well be chan_sip :-))
> 
> No, we need something in the 4xx class. I haven't had time to go through and consider all the options in the massive set of RFCs we have to work with, but will try to do that tonight after a Friday night dinner - if no one on the list comes up with the solution before that. 
> 
> Isn't that a hacker way of spending Friday night - enjoying the wonderful prose of RFC3261 and companions?
> 
> /O

What about a 481 if the 4xx is going to be used?

---fred
http://qxork.com