[asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

--[ UxBoD ]-- uxbod at splatnix.net
Thu Jan 14 04:08:33 CST 2010


Hi,

running Asterisk 1.6.2.0 and have started to see in messages:

[Jan 14 05:43:43] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (4007ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 05:43:53] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (9ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 05:44:02] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (5008ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 05:44:12] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (7ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:44:43] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (3008ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:44:53] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (9ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:45:04] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (5008ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:45:14] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (7ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:10:27] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (3007ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:10:37] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (8ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:20:37] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (4007ms / 3000ms)

If I run a constant ping to that peer all looks fine:

PING 192.168.1.110 (192.168.1.110) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.509 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=0.496 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=0.486 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=0.500 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=6 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=7 ttl=60 time=0.499 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=8 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=9 ttl=60 time=0.495 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=10 ttl=60 time=0.494 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=11 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=12 ttl=60 time=0.496 ms

Any thoughts on what cause be causing it please ?

-- 
Thanks, Phil



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list