[asterisk-users] Maximum E1 Ports on Asterisk ?
Zoel Hairi - Yahoo
zoelhairi at yahoo.co.id
Thu Dec 23 06:09:26 UTC 2010
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Cary Fitch
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:49 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Maximum E1 Ports on Asterisk ?
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Latham
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 6:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Maximum E1 Ports on Asterisk ?
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Zoel Hairi - Yahoo
<zoelhairi at yahoo.co.id> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Just a little over thought. Sorry if someone already asked about this
> before.
>
>
>
> Is it possible to put all 16 Ports of E1 in One Asterisk Server ?
>
>
>
> And if it's not possible is there any suggestion or alternative for me to
> use more than 320 lines of outgoing calls on One Asterisk Server ?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> ZH
> Zoel
> It is possible to do what you are asking. In general the issue is
> raised about having "all your eggs in one basket" where one server or
> hardware failure can drop all of your lines for a period of time.
> External solutions like Xorcom and Redfone are great ways of
> abstraction. The concurrent call load on a server relies on the work
> to be done on each call. If you are using multiple codecs and
> recording the calls in another file format with other complex dialplan
> or AGI scripts then one server may not handle the calls well. If
> everything is ALAW and just dialing though then this would not be a
> problem for one server. If you search the list for "sizing"
> "concurrent" and "load" you will find more information. One very nice
> thing is that testing is very easy with or without the E1 hardware,
> try running the TDMoE channels between two servers and run a SIPp or
> other test to see the issues in a lab.
> ~~~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lathama at gmail.com ~~~
--
_____________________________________________________________________
> In a previous post I also mentioned Xorcom. They do have a unique fail
over
> ability with their Astribank systems.
> With dual servers, separate chassis and power supplies for the 4 port
T1/E1
> cards, USB interconnections, and redundant power supplies for the
> Astribanks, system downtime can be minimized, and if there is a failure,
> repair would be at worst, no screwdriver needed.
> If system failure would be idling 200 - 400 people, avoiding system down
> time would be a major objective.
> Cary Fitch
Thanks Cary and Andrew,
This is a great suggestion and alternative for me. I will take a look at
Xorcom and the AstriBank.
Once again, Thanks guys.
ZH
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list