[asterisk-users] 1.6.0 verses 1.6.2

[John Rose]

Hello,

I can reproduce the results always.

Hardware: 
E-5200 2.5 Ghz
4 gig ram
Centos 5.4

I've tested most versions from 1.6.0.11 to 1.6.0.26.
Compared to most version of the 1.6.1.x and 1.6.2.x.

I originate calls from one box using FastAGI to another Asterisk box
that is the call sink.

1.6.1.x and 1.6.2.x always start using hi CPU at around 160+ calls and
coredumps soon afterward at 180-210 calls depending on what exactly is
happening on the call. Then I switch over to the 1.6.0.x version on the
same box with same configs (just do a make install) and can get 400+
simultaneous calls easily and sometimes over 500 before the cpu is too
high.

The call sink is just playing a few files then waiting then sending a
DTMF. The call generator is doing the same playing a couple files, not
much else.

1.6.1 and 1.6.2 suck up more cpu apparently for some reason than version
1.6.0...

John


> -----Original Message-----
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 04:25:49PM -0600, John Rose wrote:
> > Why do versions 1.6.2 and 1.6.1 use much more CPU resources that
> 1.6.0?
> > I can get 400+  SIP/G.711
> >
> > calls running on this dual core box with 1.6.0 but the cpu maxes out
> and
> > core dumps at approx. 180 calls when version 1.6.1/2 is running.
> 
> Could you please be more specific? Have you tested those versions on
> the
> same system? Can you reproduce those results?
> 
> What exact versions? On what system?
> 
> --
>                Tzafrir Cohen
> icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
> +972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
> http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
> 
> --