[asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE

Zeeshan Zakaria zishanov at gmail.com
Tue Apr 13 16:25:33 CDT 2010


Hi Danny,

Actually the issue I faced was the opposite, i.e. the channels would stay
offhook even after the hangup. Now I can't remember all the details but that
setup had a lot of problems, primarily because it was a very customized
system, and the Rhino T1 card was not able to correctly work with E1 when it
was used with AMI signalling.

Zeeshan A Zakaria

--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.

On 2010-04-13 3:03 PM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Zeeshan/Asterisk-users

We are having a little problem in our Asterisk pbx using our A102DE, just
like Zeeshan told us about problems with zap, even if a zap channel is in
use the Hookstat is always onhook, never changes to offhook

If the line is in use or not, the behavior of the Hookstate is always
onhook, is this a
problem? what should we do?

MyPbx*CLI> zap show channel 31
Channel: 31I>
File Descriptor: 44
Span: 1
Extension: I>
Dialing: no
Context: mde-g0
Caller ID: 2432690033
Calling TON: 33
Caller ID name:
Destroy: 0LI>
InAlarm: 0
Signalling Type: ISDN PRI
Radio: 0*CLI>
Owner: <None>
Real: <None>
Callwait: <None>
Threeway: <None>
Confno: -1
Propagated Conference: -1
Real in conference: 0
DSP: no
Relax DTMF: yes
Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0
Default law: alaw
Fax Handled: no
Pulse phone: no
Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently ON
PRI Flags: I>
PRI Logical Span: Implicit
Hookstate (FXS only): Onhook

Thanks in advance!


> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:20:38 -0400
> > From: Zeeshan Zakaria <zishanov at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk DIES with no trace. PLEASE
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> >        <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> > Message-ID:
> >        <5ad99e891003180820l56882922gd84102d158918d99 at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Do you properly hang up the calls. Does 'zap show channel <channel
> number>'
> > shows that the channel is 'on hook' after its hang up?
> >
> > On 2010-03-18 10:06 AM, "Danny Dias" <ing.diasdanny at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Zeeshan,
> >
> > SAngoma told me that the asterisk problem is unrelated to wanpipe
> drivers,
> > they told me to reinstall asterisk again
> >
> > But, i still having doubts about the problem :(
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
>

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100413/8edf7f42/attachment.htm 


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list